View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Specification by Example |  Business Strategy SWOT Analysis |  Agile Example Mapping |  Business Strategy Ansoff Matrix |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | SWOT Analysis arranges strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats into a compact picture of the situation. It keeps internal capabilities and external influences separate before strategic options emerge from them. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | The Ansoff Matrix organizes growth options by market and product relation. It helps weigh expansion, diversification, and adaptation cleanly against each other. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min pro Feature | 30-60 min | 30-60 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 3-12 | 3-7 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | SWOT matrix, Strategic options, Action list | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | Ansoff Matrix, Growth Options, Risk Notes |
Tagsno overlap | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | StrategyAnalysisMarketPositioning | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | GrowthStrategyMarketPortfolio |