methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Solution Interview
Product Discovery
Solution Interview
Paper illustration of a branching category tree with a highlighted search path and possible dead ends.
UX Research
Tree Testing
Surveys method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
Surveys
Paper illustration showing three sorted card stacks and an open question about a possible group.
UX Research
Card Sorting
Purposedifferent
When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation.When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination.When a topic needs to be validated broadly and many people can answer the same question, surveys gather structured feedback in a scalable form. Answers become comparable and segmentable instead of remaining merely anecdotal.When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
30-60 min je Interview1-2 Tage3-14 Tage20-45 min
Participantsdifferent
5-10 InterviewsBased on research question50+Based on research question
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Solution Feedback, Objection List, Validation NotesFindability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IASurvey Results, Charts, Segment InsightsContent groups, Label set, IA hypotheses
Tagsno overlap
ValidationInterviewsPrototype
Information architectureNavigationFindability
QuantitativeResearchValidation
Information architectureNavigationStructure
Add more methods