View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Solution Interview |  Innovation SCAMPER |  Innovation Design Sprint |  Innovation Reverse Brainstorming |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation. | For an existing solution under pressure to change, the method deliberately opens space for systematic variants. It directs attention to rebuilding, combining, and repurposing rather than only new basic ideas. This produces concrete evolution paths for products, offerings, or workflows. | When the product question is unclear and time pressure is high, the method takes a team from an open idea to a testable solution. It connects problem understanding, decision, and learning in one compact format, lowering the risk of spending a lot of energy on a mere guess. | For persistent errors or blockages, the method shifts the view to the opposite of the desired effect. It exposes the mechanics of failure and makes hidden causes easier to grasp. This makes improvement more concrete and the problem clearer. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 30-60 min | 4-5 Tage | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-10 Interviews | 2-10 | 5-8 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Solution Feedback, Objection List, Validation Notes | SCAMPER Idea List, Concept Shortlist, Variation Notes | Prototype, Test Findings, Decision Rationale | Reverse Ideas, Risk Themes, Solution Ideas |
Tagsno overlap | ValidationInterviewsPrototype | BrainstormingIdeationCreativityReframingInnovation | Design sprintPrototypeValidationInnovation | BrainstormingIdeationCreativityRisk |