View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Solution Interview |  Product Discovery Outcome-Driven Innovation |  Product Discovery Fake Door Test |  Innovation Design Sprint |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation. | Outcome-Driven Innovation clarifies customer problems, solution opportunities, and evidence. It separates jobs, desired outcomes, importance, satisfaction, and opportunity, and captures results as desired outcome statements, an opportunity landscape, and segments by underserved needs. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. | When the product question is unclear and time pressure is high, the method takes a team from an open idea to a testable solution. It connects problem understanding, decision, and learning in one compact format, lowering the risk of spending a lot of energy on a mere guess. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | Mehrere Wochen | 1-5 Tage | 4-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 5-10 Interviews | 2-6 researchers plus sample | Nutzertraffic | 5-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Solution Feedback, Objection List, Validation Notes | Desired outcome statements, Opportunity landscape, Segmentation by underserved needs, Innovation hypotheses | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision | Prototype, Test Findings, Decision Rationale |
Tagsno overlap | ValidationInterviewsPrototype | OutcomesInnovationResearchQuantitative | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery | Design sprintPrototypeValidationInnovation |