View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Solution Interview |  Systems Thinking Intervention Mapping |  Product Discovery Outcome-Driven Innovation |  Systems Thinking Future Reality Tree |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation. | Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain. | Outcome-Driven Innovation clarifies customer problems, solution opportunities, and evidence. It separates jobs, desired outcomes, importance, satisfaction, and opportunity, and captures results as desired outcome statements, an opportunity landscape, and segments by underserved needs. | A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | High | High |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 1-5 Tage | Mehrere Wochen | 2-4 h |
Participantsdifferent | 5-10 Interviews | 4-12 | 2-6 researchers plus sample | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Solution Feedback, Objection List, Validation Notes | Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation Plan | Desired outcome statements, Opportunity landscape, Segmentation by underserved needs, Innovation hypotheses | Future Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved Injections |
Tagsno overlap | ValidationInterviewsPrototype | ChangeSystems thinkingCapability | OutcomesInnovationResearchQuantitative | Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange |