View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Solution InterviewEmpathy MappingArchitecture Communication CanvasSoftware Architecture Canvas
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Solution Interview |  UX Research Empathy Mapping |  Architecture Architecture Communication Canvas |  Architecture Software Architecture Canvas |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation. | When a lot is assumed about a target group but little is seen jointly, empathy mapping makes knowledge and gaps directly comparable. The picture also shows which assumptions hold up and where evidence is missing. | The Architecture Communication Canvas plans architecture communication so the right people receive the right message. The method turns technical complexity into deliberate communication design. | The Software Architecture Canvas reduces a system to the most important architecture decisions, constraints, and interfaces. It is useful when teams need a resilient overall picture quickly. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 30–60 min | 60-120 min | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 5-10 Interviews | 4-8 | 2-8 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Solution Feedback, Objection List, Validation Notes | Empathy Map, Assumptions List, Research Gaps | Communication Canvas, Stakeholder Messages, Architecture Communication Plan | Architecture Canvas, Goals, Constraints, Quality Attributes |
Tagsno overlap | ValidationInterviewsPrototype | SynthesisQualitativeWorkshop | ArchitectureCommunicationStakeholdersCanvas | CanvasArchitectureAlignmentWorkshop |