View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Solution Interview |  Innovation Contradiction Analysis |  Product Discovery Concierge MVP |  Innovation TRIZ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation. | When a system should improve while another measure suffers as a result, the method makes the underlying conflict precisely formulable. It separates the desired effect from its side effect. This makes solutions possible that address the contradiction deliberately instead of half-heartedly. | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. | For technical contradictions or trade-offs, the method looks for solutions that resolve opposing requirements at the same time. It translates limits into an explicit picture of conflict that becomes workable. This produces not just compromises but more elegant principles. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 60-120 min | 1-4 Wochen | 1-4 h |
Participantsdifferent | 5-10 Interviews | 2-8 | 3-10 Kunden | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Solution Feedback, Objection List, Validation Notes | Contradiction Statement, Abstraction Notes, Solution Principles, Concept Ideas | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks | Contradiction Statement, Inventive Principles, Solution Concepts |
Tagsno overlap | ValidationInterviewsPrototype | ContradictionsInnovationProblem solving | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery | InnovationProblem solvingContradictionsCreativity |