View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Solution Interview | ![]() Business Strategy Ansoff Matrix | ![]() Product Strategy DIBB | ![]() Decision Making Delphi Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation. | The Ansoff Matrix organizes growth options by market and product relation. It helps weigh expansion, diversification, and adaptation cleanly against each other. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 45-90 min | 1-2 h | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 5-10 Interviews | 2-8 | 2-8 | 6-30 Experten |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Solution Feedback, Objection List, Validation Notes | Ansoff Matrix, Growth Options, Risk Notes | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Expert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption Notes |
Tagsno overlap | ValidationInterviewsPrototype | GrowthStrategyMarketPortfolio | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy |



