methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Software Architecture Canvas method illustration showing its working structure
Architecture
Software Architecture Canvas
Surveys method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
Surveys
Paper illustration of the Consensus Workshop working structure.
Facilitation
Consensus Workshop
Paper illustration for Risk Storming.
Architecture
Risk Storming
Purposedifferent
The Software Architecture Canvas reduces a system to the most important architecture decisions, constraints, and interfaces. It is useful when teams need a resilient overall picture quickly.When a topic needs to be validated broadly and many people can answer the same question, surveys gather structured feedback in a scalable form. Answers become comparable and segmentable instead of remaining merely anecdotal.When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time.Helps clarify architecture context, options, and consequences in concrete terms. It organizes technical context, alternatives, and consequences. The result is captured as an Annotated Diagram, a Prioritized Risk List, and an Action Backlog.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
1-2 h3-14 Tage1-3 h60-90 min
Participantsdifferent
3-1050+5-304-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Architecture Canvas, Goals, Constraints, Quality AttributesSurvey Results, Charts, Segment InsightsConsensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority AreasAnnotated Diagram, Prioritized Risk List, Action Backlog
Tagsno overlap
CanvasArchitectureAlignmentWorkshop
QuantitativeResearchValidation
FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment
RiskArchitectureWorkshopValidation
Add more methods