View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Software Architecture CanvasDot VotingArchitecture Communication CanvasNominal Group Technique
| Criterion |  Architecture Software Architecture Canvas |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Architecture Architecture Communication Canvas |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | The Software Architecture Canvas reduces a system to the most important architecture decisions, constraints, and interfaces. It is useful when teams need a resilient overall picture quickly. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | The Architecture Communication Canvas plans architecture communication so the right people receive the right message. The method turns technical complexity into deliberate communication design. | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 5-15 min | 60-120 min | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 3-20 | 2-8 | 5-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Architecture Canvas, Goals, Constraints, Quality Attributes | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Communication Canvas, Stakeholder Messages, Architecture Communication Plan | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority |
Tagsno overlap | CanvasArchitectureAlignmentWorkshop | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | ArchitectureCommunicationStakeholdersCanvas | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion |