methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Paper illustration of Shape-first Modeling with its method-specific working model.
Knowledge Modeling
Shape-First Modeling
Paper illustration of Competency Questions with its method-specific working model.
Knowledge Modeling
Competency Questions
A/B Testing workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
A/B Testing
Purposedifferent
When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.Shape-First Modeling defines data quality through shapes before implementation or integration frays at the edges. The approach fits when validation and data contracts should be part of the design from the start.Competency Questions translate a domain model into concrete questions that it must be able to answer. The method keeps the model's scope clean and prevents pretty but useless structures.When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumHigh
Timedifferent
1-5 TageHalber Tag pro Domain Slice2-4 h1-4 Wochen
Participantsdifferent
Nutzertraffic1-42-81-6
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Interest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning NoteSHACL or ShEx Shapes, Validation Reports, Data Contracts, Shape DocumentationCompetency Question Set, Required Concepts, Test Queries, Coverage MatrixExperiment results, Decision log, Learning summary
Tagsno overlap
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
Knowledge graphValidationSemantic
OntologyKnowledge graphScopeRequirementsSemantic
ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation
Add more methods