methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper matrix with six colored hat cards for information, feeling, value, caution, ideas and process control.
Facilitation
Six Thinking Hats
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Paper illustration for Constraint Analysis.
Decision Making
Constraint Analysis
Paper illustration for DACI
Decision Making
DACI
Purposedifferent
When a topic gets stuck too quickly in the same thinking mode, Six Thinking Hats deliberately separates the perspectives. This means facts, risks, creativity, and emotional signals get worked through one after another instead of mixed together.When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences.When an initiative stalls, the limit often lies not in the idea but in hard or soft boundary conditions. Constraint Analysis separates these limits and shows which of them can actually be shaped.In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min45-90 min30-90 min30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
4-123-102-82-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Perspective Notes, Decision Inputs, Action ItemsResponsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open QuestionsConstraint List, Hard/Soft Classification, Option Impact Notes, Decision BoundariesDACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision Log
Tagsno overlap
FacilitationOptionsDecision
RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation
ConstraintsDecisionPlanningOptions
DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment
Add more methods