View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Delivery Shape Up |  Knowledge Modeling Teach-back |  Architecture C4 Model |  Knowledge Modeling Feynman Technique |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Shape Up helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow. It makes work boundaries and decisions explicit and captures results as pitches, bet-table decisions, and hill charts. | Teach-back checks whether an explanation actually got through to the other person. The method makes misunderstandings visible early and strengthens shared understanding in advisory and learning situations. | The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes. | The Feynman Technique checks understanding by explaining a topic so that it stays easy for others to understand. It makes knowledge gaps visible before they become costly in everyday work. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 6 Wochen Cycle + 2 Wochen Cool-Down | 5-20 min | 1-4 h | 20-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-4 pro Pitch | 2-8 | 1-5 | 1 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Pitches, Bet-table decisions, Hill charts, Cooldown outcomes | Understanding Check, Clarification Notes, Learning Gaps | Context Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram | Plain-language Explanation, Knowledge Gaps, Study Notes |
Tagsno overlap | PlanningDeliveryAutonomy | LearningUnderstandingCommunication | ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization | LearningKnowledgeUnderstanding |