methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Shape Up with its method-specific working model.
Delivery
Shape Up
Game Day workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
DevOps
Game Day
Blameless Postmortem workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
DevOps
Blameless Postmortem
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Purposedifferent
Shape Up helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow. It makes work boundaries and decisions explicit and captures results as pitches, bet-table decisions, and hill charts.In preparing for rare incidents, the method tests response capability under controlled conditions. It shows where assumptions about stability, roles, and recovery are too optimistic.After an incident with damage or a near miss, the method creates a sober field for learning without assigning blame. It directs attention to the course of events, conditions, and effective countermeasures.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighMediumLow
Timedifferent
6 Wochen Cycle + 2 Wochen Cool-DownHalber Tag30-90 min10-20 min daily
Participantsdifferent
2-4 pro Pitch5-203-121
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Pitches, Bet-table decisions, Hill charts, Cooldown outcomesSimulation Notes, Gaps List, Updated RunbooksPostmortem Doc, Action Items, TimelineDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review Notes
Tagsno overlap
PlanningDeliveryAutonomy
ResilienceOperationsIncident
Site Reliability EngineeringIncidentLearningReliability
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Add more methods