methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Shape Up with its method-specific working model.
Delivery
Shape Up
Funnel Analysis workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
Funnel Analysis
Paper illustration for Communication Plan
Delivery
Communication Plan
A/B Testing workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
A/B Testing
Purposedifferent
Shape Up helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow. It makes work boundaries and decisions explicit and captures results as pitches, bet-table decisions, and hill charts.When many visitors or users drop off along the way, the reason behind the number often stays hidden. Funnel Analysis exposes these transitions and makes visible exactly where the path collapses.When many people need to be informed in parallel and messages would otherwise arrive unevenly or too late, a Communication Plan orders communication reliably. Channels, audiences, and cadences interlock so important information doesn't get lost.When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowHigh
Timedifferent
6 Wochen Cycle + 2 Wochen Cool-Down1-3 h45-90 min1-4 Wochen
Participantsdifferent
2-4 pro Pitch1-52-61-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Pitches, Bet-table decisions, Hill charts, Cooldown outcomesFunnel report, Drop-off analysis, Optimization hypothesesCommunication Plan, Channel Matrix, Message CadenceExperiment results, Decision log, Learning summary
Tagsno overlap
PlanningDeliveryAutonomy
AnalyticsConversionGrowth
CommunicationStakeholdersDeliveryPlanning
ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation
Add more methods