methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Shape Up with its method-specific working model.
Delivery
Shape Up
A/B Testing workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
A/B Testing
Paper illustration for Communication Plan
Delivery
Communication Plan
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Purposedifferent
Shape Up helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow. It makes work boundaries and decisions explicit and captures results as pitches, bet-table decisions, and hill charts.When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects.When many people need to be informed in parallel and messages would otherwise arrive unevenly or too late, a Communication Plan orders communication reliably. Channels, audiences, and cadences interlock so important information doesn't get lost.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighLowLow
Timedifferent
6 Wochen Cycle + 2 Wochen Cool-Down1-4 Wochen45-90 min1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
2-4 pro Pitch1-62-6Nutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Pitches, Bet-table decisions, Hill charts, Cooldown outcomesExperiment results, Decision log, Learning summaryCommunication Plan, Channel Matrix, Message CadenceInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning Note
Tagsno overlap
PlanningDeliveryAutonomy
ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation
CommunicationStakeholdersDeliveryPlanning
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
Add more methods