methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Shape-first Modeling with its method-specific working model.
Knowledge Modeling
Shape-First Modeling
Paper illustration for Future Reality Tree.
Systems Thinking
Future Reality Tree
Paper illustration of Competency Questions with its method-specific working model.
Knowledge Modeling
Competency Questions
Paper illustration for Evaporating Cloud.
Systems Thinking
Evaporating Cloud
Purposedifferent
Shape-First Modeling defines data quality through shapes before implementation or integration frays at the edges. The approach fits when validation and data contracts should be part of the design from the start.A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation.Competency Questions translate a domain model into concrete questions that it must be able to answer. The method keeps the model's scope clean and prevents pretty but useless structures.The method makes visible why two seemingly incompatible demands arise and which assumption must be tested to resolve the conflict.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighMediumMedium
Timedifferent
Halber Tag pro Domain Slice2-4 h2-4 h60-120 min
Participantsdifferent
1-43-82-82-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
SHACL or ShEx Shapes, Validation Reports, Data Contracts, Shape DocumentationFuture Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved InjectionsCompetency Question Set, Required Concepts, Test Queries, Coverage MatrixConflict Cloud, Assumption List, Breakthrough Ideas, Next Experiments
Tagsno overlap
Knowledge graphValidationSemantic
Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange
OntologyKnowledge graphScopeRequirementsSemantic
Theory of ConstraintsAssumptionsSystems thinking
Add more methods