View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Service BlueprintingBottleneck AnalysisFailure Mode and Effects AnalysisTheory of Constraints
| Criterion |  UX Design Service Blueprinting |  Operations Bottleneck Analysis |  Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis |  Operations Theory of Constraints |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a service experience is spread across several touchpoints, it brings frontstage and backstage together. It shows where user contact and internal responsibility must fit. | For a flow that backs up at one point, the method looks for the capacity limit with the greatest leverage. It explains why extra effort elsewhere barely improves throughput. | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. | For a system that does not get faster despite effort, the method directs attention to the bottleneck. It concentrates improvement on the point that actually limits throughput. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | High | High |
Timedifferent | 0.5-2 Tage | 1-3 h | 2-6 h | 2-4 h Analyse, laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 6-12 | 3-8 | 3-10 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Service Blueprint, Fail Points, Ownership Map | Bottleneck Map, Flow Metrics, Improvement Options, Follow-up Measures | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions | Constraint Map, Improvement Plan, Flow Metrics |
Tagsno overlap | Service designOperationsJourneyBlueprint | FlowMeasurementConstraints | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause | OperationsConstraintsFlowImprovement |