View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Scrum |  Decision Making Decision Tree |  Agile Example Mapping |  Facilitation Six Thinking Hats |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a team needs to work in a fixed delivery rhythm, it stabilizes cadence, responsibility, and feedback loops. It makes collaboration reliable across sprint boundaries. | For decisions with follow-on paths and dependencies, a linear comparison is often not enough. A Decision Tree shows how options branch under conditions and which consequences hang on each branch. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | When a topic gets stuck too quickly in the same thinking mode, Six Thinking Hats deliberately separates the perspectives. This means facts, risks, creativity, and emotional signals get worked through one after another instead of mixed together. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen je Sprint, laufend | 30-90 min | 30-60 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 (Scrum Team) | 1-6 | 3-7 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Product Backlog, Sprint Backlog, Increment, Sprint Goal | Decision Tree, Option Map, Assumption List | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | Perspective Notes, Decision Inputs, Action Items |
Tagsno overlap | AgileIterationCadence | DecisionTreeOptions | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | FacilitationOptionsDecision |