View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:ScrumATAM (Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method)ROAM BoardLASR (Lightweight Approach for Software Reviews)
| Criterion |  Agile Scrum |  Architecture ATAM (Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method) |  Agile ROAM Board |  Architecture LASR (Lightweight Approach for Software Reviews) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a team needs to work in a fixed delivery rhythm, it stabilizes cadence, responsibility, and feedback loops. It makes collaboration reliable across sprint boundaries. | ATAM helps teams weigh architecture decisions when quality goals compete. The team considers business goals, stakeholder expectations, and technical decisions together. The evaluation shows which risks need further investigation. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | LASR helps development teams identify where their software falls short of important quality goals and which improvements to consider. A small group with existing system knowledge can make an initial assessment and investigate open questions in more detail. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen je Sprint, laufend | Several meetings plus preparation and analysis; total effort depends on scope | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 3–4 h for initial assessment; preparation and deeper analysis additional |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 (Scrum Team) | Evaluation team, architects, and relevant stakeholders | 3-15 | 1 or a small team; particularly suitable for 3–4 people |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Product Backlog, Sprint Backlog, Increment, Sprint Goal | Prioritized quality scenarios in a utility tree, Architecture risks with reasoning and assumptions, Sensitivity and trade-off points, Findings report with open investigations | ROAM Board, Owner List | Lean Mission Statement describing the software’s purpose, Prioritized quality goals and evaluation criteria, Risks and estimated gaps against quality goals, More closely examined findings and open checks |
Tagsno overlap | AgileIterationCadence | ArchitectureQualityRiskTradeoffsStakeholders | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | ArchitectureQualityRiskAssessmentLean |