View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Business Strategy Scenario Planning | ![]() UX Research Card Sorting | ![]() Product Strategy Impact Mapping | ![]() UX Research Tree Testing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Scenario Planning opens the view to several plausible futures instead of a single forecast. The method protects strategies from depending on too narrow an expected path. | When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations. | When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures. | When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 0.5-2 Tage | 20-45 min | 45-90 min | 1-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | Based on research question | 3-8 | Based on research question |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Scenario Set, Strategic Implications, Robust Options | Content groups, Label set, IA hypotheses | Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery Options | Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IA |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyUncertaintyPlanning | Information architectureNavigationStructure | OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning | Information architectureNavigationFindability |



