methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Scatter Diagram with its method-specific working model.
Operations
Scatter Diagram
Paper illustration of a calibrated five-by-five risk matrix with response cards.
Decision Making
Risk Matrix
Paper illustration of an assumption matrix with prioritized test cards
Decision Making
Assumption Surfacing
Paper illustration for Pareto Analysis
Decision Making
Pareto Analysis
Purposedifferent
When the question is whether two measures are related, the method makes patterns in the data picture visible. It separates felt correlations from relationships that actually show up in the data.When a project faces many possible disruptions, it quickly becomes unclear which risks deserve attention first. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Risk Matrix and a Top Risk List.Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it.In many problem situations, effect is distributed unequally across many causes. A Pareto Analysis separates the few drivers with high leverage from the long remainder and focuses attention on what measurably moves the needle.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
30-90 min30-60 min45-90 min30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
1-43-102-81-6
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Scatter Plot, Korrelationsnotiz, HypothesenlisteRisk Matrix, Top Risk ListAssumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning PlanPareto Chart, Top Causes, Focus List
Tagsno overlap
Root causeQualityVisualization
RiskDecisionPrioritizationAssessment
AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery
PrioritizationQualityFocusRoot cause
Add more methods