methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Scatter Diagram with its method-specific working model.
Operations
Scatter Diagram
Paper illustration for Eat the Frog
Operations
Eat the Frog
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Paper illustration for Pareto Analysis
Decision Making
Pareto Analysis
Purposedifferent
When the question is whether two measures are related, the method makes patterns in the data picture visible. It separates felt correlations from relationships that actually show up in the data.The method protects energy and attention for the task that creates the largest progress and is often postponed.For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.In many problem situations, effect is distributed unequally across many causes. A Pareto Analysis separates the few drivers with high leverage from the long remainder and focuses attention on what measurably moves the needle.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowHighLow
Timedifferent
30-90 min15-90 min daily2-6 h30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
1-413-101-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Scatter Plot, Korrelationsnotiz, HypothesenlistePriority Task, Completion Note, Daily FocusFMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation ActionsPareto Chart, Top Causes, Focus List
Tagsno overlap
Root causeQualityVisualization
PrioritizationProductivityFocusExecution
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
PrioritizationQualityFocusRoot cause
Add more methods