methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Scatter Diagram with its method-specific working model.
Operations
Scatter Diagram
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper illustration for Fault Tree Analysis.
Operations
Fault Tree Analysis
Paper fishbone diagram with a measurable effect at the head and six labeled cause branches.
Operations
Fishbone Diagram
Purposedifferent
When the question is whether two measures are related, the method makes patterns in the data picture visible. It separates felt correlations from relationships that actually show up in the data.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage.When a problem has several possible contributing factors, the method sorts causes by cause areas. It prevents an initial hunch from blocking the view of other plausible drivers.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowHighLow
Timedifferent
30-90 min10-20 min daily2-6 h30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
1-413-82-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Scatter Plot, Korrelationsnotiz, HypothesenlisteDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesFault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control ActionsFishbone Diagram, Cause Categories, Investigation Backlog
Tagsno overlap
Root causeQualityVisualization
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
RiskRoot causeSafety
Root causeQualityOperations
Add more methods