methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Root Cause Analysis.
Operations
Root Cause Analysis
Paper illustration for Hypothesis-Driven Troubleshooting.
Engineering
Hypothesis-Driven Troubleshooting
Paper illustration for 8D Problem Solving.
Operations
8D Problem Solving
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Purposedifferent
When a problem keeps recurring and the cause stays unclear, the method exposes the underlying mechanism. It separates symptom, guess, and robust explanation from one another.When systems fail unexpectedly, spontaneous attempts often produce more noise than insight. Hypothesis-driven Troubleshooting translates symptoms into testable assumptions and makes troubleshooting learnable.For an acute quality or delivery problem, the method structures immediate protection and root cause work together. It keeps the situation stable while the actual cause is investigated cleanly.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumHighLow
Timedifferent
1-4 h30-240 min1-6 Wochen15-30 min
Participantsdifferent
3-81-64-102-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Problem Statement, Cause Hypotheses, Confirmed Causes, Action PlanHypothesis Log, Test Plan, Evidence Notes, Diagnosis Summary8D Report, Containment Plan, Root Cause Evidence, Corrective Action PlanRoot cause notes, Countermeasures
Tags1 shared
Root causeProblem solvingQualityIncident
TroubleshootingProblem solvingDiagnosis
QualityProblem solvingRoot cause
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
Add more methods