View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile ROAM Board |  UX Research Tree Testing |  Growth A/B Testing |  UX Research Card Sorting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination. | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. | When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 1-2 Tage | 1-4 Wochen | 20-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-15 | Based on research question | 1-6 | Based on research question |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | ROAM Board, Owner List | Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IA | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary | Content groups, Label set, IA hypotheses |
Tagsno overlap | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | Information architectureNavigationFindability | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation | Information architectureNavigationStructure |