methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper board with the four ROAM fields Resolved, Owned, Accepted, and Mitigated.
Agile
ROAM Board
A paper-based illustration representing OKRs with its core stages and visible working result.
Product Strategy
OKRs
Paper illustration of Counter Metrics with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
Counter Metrics
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Purposedifferent
When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List.When strategic direction needs to become measurable, it connects ambition with checkable results. It makes goals connectable to focus and review.When a headline metric could mask side effects, it adds guardrail signals against unwanted outcomes. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a counter-metric list and guardrail definitions.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
20-40 min initial, dann laufend1-2 h Setup30-60 min1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
3-152-202-64-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
ROAM Board, Owner ListOKR set, Measurement plan, Review cadenceCounter Metric List, Guardrail DefinitionsAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions
Tagsno overlap
RiskAgileTrackingAlignment
GoalsAlignmentOutcomesMeasurement
MetricsMeasurementStrategyExperiments
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
Add more methods