View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile ROAM Board |  Product Discovery Assumption Mapping |  Product Strategy KPI Tree |  Growth A/B Testing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first. | When metrics across the organization drift apart, it arranges drivers and effects under one shared logic. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a KPI tree and owner list. | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 45-60 min | 90-180 min initial, dann laufend | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 3-15 | 2-8 | 3-8 | 1-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | ROAM Board, Owner List | Assumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking | KPI Tree, Owner List | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary |
Tagsno overlap | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation | MetricsStrategyAlignmentMeasurement | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation |