View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Risk StormingLASR (Lightweight Approach for Software Reviews)Assumption SurfacingRiskiest Assumption Test
| Criterion | ![]() Architecture Risk Storming | ![]() Architecture LASR (Lightweight Approach for Software Reviews) | ![]() Decision Making Assumption Surfacing | ![]() Product Discovery Riskiest Assumption Test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify architecture context, options, and consequences in concrete terms. It organizes technical context, alternatives, and consequences. The result is captured as an Annotated Diagram, a Prioritized Risk List, and an Action Backlog. | LASR helps development teams identify where their software falls short of important quality goals and which improvements to consider. A small group with existing system knowledge can make an initial assessment and investigate open questions in more detail. | Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it. | When an idea hinges on one critical unknown, it prioritizes testing that exact piece of uncertainty first. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a prioritized list of assumptions, a test plan, and a result report. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min | 3–4 h for initial assessment; preparation and deeper analysis additional | 45-90 min | 1-2 Wochen pro Iteration |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 1 or a small team; particularly suitable for 3–4 people | 2-8 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Annotated Diagram, Prioritized Risk List, Action Backlog | Lean Mission Statement describing the software’s purpose, Prioritized quality goals and evaluation criteria, Risks and estimated gaps against quality goals, More closely examined findings and open checks | Assumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning Plan | Prioritized Assumption List, Test Plan, Results Report |
Tagsno overlap | RiskArchitectureWorkshopValidation | ArchitectureQualityRiskAssessmentLean | AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryAssumptions |



