View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Risk StormingHypothesis-Driven TroubleshootingLASR (Lightweight Approach for Software Reviews)A3 Problem Solving
| Criterion | ![]() Architecture Risk Storming | ![]() Engineering Hypothesis-Driven Troubleshooting | ![]() Architecture LASR (Lightweight Approach for Software Reviews) | ![]() Operations A3 Problem Solving |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify architecture context, options, and consequences in concrete terms. It organizes technical context, alternatives, and consequences. The result is captured as an Annotated Diagram, a Prioritized Risk List, and an Action Backlog. | When systems fail unexpectedly, spontaneous attempts often produce more noise than insight. Hypothesis-driven Troubleshooting translates symptoms into testable assumptions and makes troubleshooting learnable. | LASR helps development teams identify where their software falls short of important quality goals and which improvements to consider. A small group with existing system knowledge can make an initial assessment and investigate open questions in more detail. | For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min | 30-240 min | 3–4 h for initial assessment; preparation and deeper analysis additional | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 1-6 | 1 or a small team; particularly suitable for 3–4 people | 2-5 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Annotated Diagram, Prioritized Risk List, Action Backlog | Hypothesis Log, Test Plan, Evidence Notes, Diagnosis Summary | Lean Mission Statement describing the software’s purpose, Prioritized quality goals and evaluation criteria, Risks and estimated gaps against quality goals, More closely examined findings and open checks | A3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause Analysis |
Tagsno overlap | RiskArchitectureWorkshopValidation | TroubleshootingProblem solvingDiagnosis | ArchitectureQualityRiskAssessmentLean | LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations |



