methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a calibrated five-by-five risk matrix with response cards.
Decision Making
Risk Matrix
Paper illustration for Knowledge Mapping.
Knowledge Modeling
Knowledge Mapping
Paper illustration of Request for Comments (RFC) with its method-specific working model.
Architecture
Request for Comments
Paper illustration: scenarios and architectural decisions are connected to identified risks.
Architecture
ATAM (Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method)
Purposedifferent
When a project faces many possible disruptions, it quickly becomes unclear which risks deserve attention first. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Risk Matrix and a Top Risk List.Knowledge Mapping makes knowledge, gaps, and transfer paths visible across a field. It fits when expertise should not just exist but also be findable and transferable.An RFC clarifies architecture context, options, and consequences. It structures technical context, alternatives, tradeoffs, open questions, and review feedback, and captures the result as an RFC document, reviewer comments, and a decision rationale.ATAM helps teams weigh architecture decisions when quality goals compete. The team considers business goals, stakeholder expectations, and technical decisions together. The evaluation shows which risks need further investigation.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumHigh
Timedifferent
30-60 min1-3 h1-3 Wochen vom Draft bis zur EntscheidungSeveral meetings plus preparation and analysis; total effort depends on scope
Participantsdifferent
3-103-123-20 ReviewerEvaluation team, architects, and relevant stakeholders
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Risk Matrix, Top Risk ListKnowledge Map, Critical Knowledge Areas, Transfer PlanRFC document, Reviewer comments, Decision rationale, Follow-up ADR or ticketsPrioritized quality scenarios in a utility tree, Architecture risks with reasoning and assumptions, Sensitivity and trade-off points, Findings report with open investigations
Tagsno overlap
RiskDecisionPrioritizationAssessment
KnowledgeMappingRisk
ArchitectureDecisionAsyncGovernance
ArchitectureQualityRiskTradeoffsStakeholders
Add more methods