methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Request for Comments (RFC) with its method-specific working model.
Architecture
Request for Comments
Paper illustration for Decision Framing Workshop.
Decision Making
Decision Framing Workshop
Paper illustration for RAPID
Decision Making
RAPID
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Purposedifferent
An RFC clarifies architecture context, options, and consequences. It structures technical context, alternatives, tradeoffs, open questions, and review feedback, and captures the result as an RFC document, reviewer comments, and a decision rationale.When a decision is poorly framed, even good answers deliver little value. A Decision Framing Workshop sharpens the problem, goal, and boundaries before the actual weighing begins.In complex management decisions, clarity is often missing about who recommends, who agrees, and who makes the decision. RAPID creates this assignment and stabilizes decisions across several levels.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
1-3 Wochen vom Draft bis zur Entscheidung60-120 min45-90 min15-45 min
Participantsdifferent
3-20 Reviewer4-103-121-3
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
RFC document, Reviewer comments, Decision rationale, Follow-up ADR or ticketsDecision Frame, Decision Question, Criteria List, Evidence PlanRAPID Role Map, Recommendation, Decision LogADR File, Decision Log, Rationale
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureDecisionAsyncGovernance
Decision framingAlignmentCriteriaOptions
DecisionRolesGovernance
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
Add more methods