methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Request for Comments (RFC) with its method-specific working model.
Architecture
Request for Comments
Paper illustration for Current Reality Tree
Systems Thinking
Current Reality Tree
Paper illustration for Change Analysis.
Operations
Change Analysis
Paper illustration for Causal Factor Analysis.
Operations
Causal Factor Analysis
Purposedifferent
An RFC clarifies architecture context, options, and consequences. It structures technical context, alternatives, tradeoffs, open questions, and review feedback, and captures the result as an RFC document, reviewer comments, and a decision rationale.A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.For a deviation after a change, the method isolates the influence of the altered condition. It narrows down which differences are relevant and which are just accompanying noise.For an event with a complicated course, the method breaks down the contributing factors along the timeline. It shows how conditions, decisions, and reactions together produce a course of events.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighMediumHigh
Timedifferent
1-3 Wochen vom Draft bis zur Entscheidung2-6 h45-120 min2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
3-20 Reviewer3-82-63-10
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
RFC document, Reviewer comments, Decision rationale, Follow-up ADR or ticketsCurrent Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention IdeasChange Matrix, Cause Hypotheses, Validation Questions, Action ListEvent Timeline, Causal Factor Chart, Cause List, Corrective Actions
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureDecisionAsyncGovernance
Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality
ChangeRoot causeTroubleshootingComparison
CausalityIncidentRoot causeTimeline
Add more methods