View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Architecture Request for Comments |  Innovation Crazy 8s |  Decision Making Cynefin Workshop |  Innovation Rapid Ideation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | An RFC clarifies architecture context, options, and consequences. It structures technical context, alternatives, tradeoffs, open questions, and review feedback, and captures the result as an RFC document, reviewer comments, and a decision rationale. | With only a few minutes available and a still-fuzzy solution search, the method forces a wide range of variants. It produces fast sketches before the first idea can settle in, making different directions directly comparable and open to further development. | When problems are unclear, chaotic, or only seemingly familiar, standard recipes fall short. A Cynefin Workshop sorts situations by the nature of their problem and connects them with matching action logic. | When a decision needs to be prepared quickly, the method generates many solution-close variants in a short time. It deliberately relies on pace to undercut self-censorship and perfectionism. This quickly produces a usable field for prioritization and further work. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 Wochen vom Draft bis zur Entscheidung | 8-15 min | 60-180 min | 5-20 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-20 Reviewer | 1-10 | 4-20 | 1-20 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | RFC document, Reviewer comments, Decision rationale, Follow-up ADR or tickets | Sketch Set, Idea Shortlist, Direction Options | Cynefin Map, Domain-specific Actions, Sensemaking Notes | Ideenpool, Roh-Shortlist, Cluster |
Tagsno overlap | ArchitectureDecisionAsyncGovernance | BrainstormingSketchingSpeedDivergenceDesign sprint | ComplexitySensemakingDecision | BrainstormingIdeationDivergenceSpeed |