methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Paper illustration of System Dynamics Simulation with its method-specific working model.
Systems Thinking
System Dynamics Simulation
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
Stock and Flow Diagram method illustration showing its working structure
Systems Thinking
Stock and Flow Diagram
Purposedifferent
When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences.System Dynamics Simulation makes assumptions about time, delay, and feedback testable through experiments. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a simulation model and scenario reports.With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.A Stock and Flow Diagram shows how stocks, inflows, and outflows shape a system over time. It is especially suited when growth, delays, or capacity limits determine the dynamics.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighLowHigh
Timedifferent
45-90 minMehrere Tage bis Wochen20-45 min2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
3-101-5 Modellierende, Stakeholder asynchron1-81-6
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open QuestionsSimulation Model, Scenario ReportsOwnership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching NotesStock and Flow Model, Dynamics Notes, Simulation Hypotheses
Tagsno overlap
RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation
Systems thinkingDynamicsSimulationAnalysis
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
DynamicsSimulationFeedbackSystems thinking
Add more methods