View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Innovation SCAMPER |
|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | For an existing solution under pressure to change, the method deliberately opens space for systematic variants. It directs attention to rebuilding, combining, and repurposing rather than only new basic ideas. This produces concrete evolution paths for products, offerings, or workflows. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 2-10 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | SCAMPER Idea List, Concept Shortlist, Variation Notes |
Tagsno overlap | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | BrainstormingIdeationCreativityReframingInnovation |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
