View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Facilitation Mind Mapping |  Facilitation Lean Coffee |  Facilitation Delegation Poker |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | When a topic is still unclear and too many thoughts surface at once, Mind Mapping creates an open surface for ordering them. It makes connections, subtopics, and starting points visible without fixing them too early. | When a group without a fixed agenda needs to get into useful conversations quickly, Lean Coffee structures the start around interests rather than a presentation. The group itself negotiates which topics get time first and which wait. | When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 15-45 min | 30-90 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 1-10 | 3-20 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Mind Map, Topic Clusters, Open Questions | Prioritized Topics, Discussion Notes, Action Items | Delegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements |
Tagsno overlap | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | BrainstormingIdeasMappingStructureFacilitation | FacilitationAutonomyDialogue | AutonomyRolesTeam |