View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Innovation Crazy 8s |  Operations Accountability Ladder |  Innovation Brainstorming |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | With only a few minutes available and a still-fuzzy solution search, the method forces a wide range of variants. It produces fast sketches before the first idea can settle in, making different directions directly comparable and open to further development. | With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on. | When a team faces an open question with many obvious directions, the method first creates breadth instead of premature commitment. It separates idea flow from evaluation and makes lines of thought visible, creating a pool for selection and further development. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 8-15 min | 20-45 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 1-10 | 1-8 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Sketch Set, Idea Shortlist, Direction Options | Ownership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching Notes | Idea pool, Theme clusters, Shortlist |
Tagsno overlap | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | BrainstormingSketchingSpeedDivergenceDesign sprint | ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam | BrainstormingIdeationCreativityWorkshopDivergence |