methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
Paper fishbone diagram with a measurable effect at the head and six labeled cause branches.
Operations
Fishbone Diagram
Paper illustration for Delegation Poker.
Facilitation
Delegation Poker
Purposedifferent
When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences.With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.When a problem has several possible contributing factors, the method sorts causes by cause areas. It prevents an initial hunch from blocking the view of other plausible drivers.When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min20-45 min30-60 min45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
3-101-82-83-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open QuestionsOwnership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching NotesFishbone Diagram, Cause Categories, Investigation BacklogDelegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements
Tagsno overlap
RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
Root causeQualityOperations
AutonomyRolesTeam
Add more methods