View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:RAID LogROAM BoardLASR (Lightweight Approach for Software Reviews)Stakeholder Salience Model
| Criterion |  Delivery RAID Log |  Agile ROAM Board |  Architecture LASR (Lightweight Approach for Software Reviews) |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | LASR helps development teams identify where their software falls short of important quality goals and which improvements to consider. A small group with existing system knowledge can make an initial assessment and investigate open questions in more detail. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 3–4 h for initial assessment; preparation and deeper analysis additional | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 3-15 | 1 or a small team; particularly suitable for 3–4 people | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | RAID Log, Status Report Source | ROAM Board, Owner List | Lean Mission Statement describing the software’s purpose, Prioritized quality goals and evaluation criteria, Risks and estimated gaps against quality goals, More closely examined findings and open checks | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class |
Tagsno overlap | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | ArchitectureQualityRiskAssessmentLean | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance |