View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Delivery RAID Log |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |  Growth North Star Metric |  Agile ROAM Board |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | When product teams track many metrics, the view of the actual customer outcome easily gets lost. A North Star Metric bundles growth, usage, and value contribution into one signal that makes the system's direction visible. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 1-2 h | 1-2 h | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 4-12 | 3-8 | 3-15 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | North Star metric, Input metric tree, Measurement cadence | ROAM Board, Owner List |
Tagsno overlap | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | GrowthMetricsAlignmentRetention | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment |