View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Radar |  Agile WSJF |  Delivery Cost of Delay |  Product Strategy ICE Scoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do. | When many tasks compete for the same capacity, it orders work by economic impact. It makes time lost, benefit, and effort comparable together. | Helps clarify scope, order, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, constraints, and sequence manageable. The result is captured as a Cost of Delay table and prioritization sequence. | When ideas need sorting quickly, it condenses impact, confidence, and effort into one compact score. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as an ICE table and top-ideas list. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 45-90 min | 90-180 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | 3-10 | 3-8 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action Areas | Ranked Backlog, Cost-of-Delay Assumptions | CoD Table, Prioritization Sequence | ICE Table, Top Idea List |
Tagsno overlap | AssessmentPortfolioCapability | LeanEconomicsSequencePrioritization | PrioritizationDeliveryEconomicsDecision | PrioritizationScoringGrowthDecision |