methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper radar with five axes, two current and target profiles, and evidence cards beside each dimension.
Decision Making
Radar
Paper illustration of a branching impact map with a Why goal at the root, actor circles, How behavior changes and What options.
Product Strategy
Impact Mapping
Paper illustration of a two-by-two Ansoff Matrix with four growth directions
Business Strategy
Ansoff Matrix
Paper illustration of Hooked Model with its method-specific working model.
Growth
Hooked Model
Purposedifferent
When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do.When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures.The Ansoff Matrix organizes growth options by market and product relation. It helps weigh expansion, diversification, and adaptation cleanly against each other.The Hooked Model helps clarify engagement loops, user behavior, and experiments. It makes repeat behavior measurable and captures the result as a hooked loop, trigger map, and reward design.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 h45-90 min45-90 minMultiple workshops over several weeks
Participantsdifferent
2-103-82-82-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action AreasImpact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery OptionsAnsoff Matrix, Growth Options, Risk NotesHooked loop, Trigger map, Reward design, Ethics check
Tagsno overlap
AssessmentPortfolioCapability
OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning
GrowthStrategyMarketPortfolio
GrowthBehaviorRetention
Add more methods