methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper radar with five axes, two current and target profiles, and evidence cards beside each dimension.
Decision Making
Radar
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
A paper-based illustration representing OKRs with its core stages and visible working result.
Product Strategy
OKRs
Paper illustration of Counter Metrics with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
Counter Metrics
Purposedifferent
When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do.Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.When strategic direction needs to become measurable, it connects ambition with checkable results. It makes goals connectable to focus and review.When a headline metric could mask side effects, it adds guardrail signals against unwanted outcomes. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a counter-metric list and guardrail definitions.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
1-2 h120 min initial, dann laufend1-2 h Setup30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
2-103-62-202-6
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action AreasHEART-GSM Table, DashboardOKR set, Measurement plan, Review cadenceCounter Metric List, Guardrail Definitions
Tagsno overlap
AssessmentPortfolioCapability
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
GoalsAlignmentOutcomesMeasurement
MetricsMeasurementStrategyExperiments
Add more methods