View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Decision Making Radar | ![]() Decision Making DACI | ![]() Facilitation Responsibility Poker | ![]() Operations RACI Matrix |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do. | In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | With unclear responsibilities across several roles or areas, the method creates unambiguous accountability logic. It reduces friction because decision, execution, contribution, and information become separately visible. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 30-60 min | 45-90 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | 2-10 | 3-10 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action Areas | DACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision Log | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | RACI Matrix, Responsibility Map, Decision Notes |
Tagsno overlap | AssessmentPortfolioCapability | DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | RolesResponsibilityGovernanceOperations |



