methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper radar with five axes, two current and target profiles, and evidence cards beside each dimension.
Decision Making
Radar
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Paper illustration of a two-by-two Ansoff Matrix with four growth directions
Business Strategy
Ansoff Matrix
A paper-based illustration representing C4 Model with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
C4 Model
Purposedifferent
When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do.arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.The Ansoff Matrix organizes growth options by market and product relation. It helps weigh expansion, diversification, and adaptation cleanly against each other.The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowLow
Timedifferent
1-2 h1-2 Tage45-90 min1-4 h
Participantsdifferent
2-101-42-81-5
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action AreasArchitecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment ViewAnsoff Matrix, Growth Options, Risk NotesContext Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram
Tagsno overlap
AssessmentPortfolioCapability
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
GrowthStrategyMarketPortfolio
ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization
Add more methods