methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper radar with five axes, two current and target profiles, and evidence cards beside each dimension.
Decision Making
Radar
Paper illustration of a two-by-two Ansoff Matrix with four growth directions
Business Strategy
Ansoff Matrix
Paper illustration of the McKinsey 7S Framework with seven connected fields
Business Strategy
McKinsey 7S
Paper illustration for Intervention Mapping.
Systems Thinking
Intervention Mapping
Purposedifferent
When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do.The Ansoff Matrix organizes growth options by market and product relation. It helps weigh expansion, diversification, and adaptation cleanly against each other.McKinsey 7S checks whether Strategy, Structure, Systems, Shared Values, Skills, Style, and Staff fit together. Organizational misalignments become visible across multiple levers as a result.Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumHigh
Timedifferent
1-2 h45-90 min2-4 h1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
2-102-83-124-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action AreasAnsoff Matrix, Growth Options, Risk Notes7S Assessment, Alignment Gaps, Change ActionsLogic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation Plan
Tagsno overlap
AssessmentPortfolioCapability
GrowthStrategyMarketPortfolio
OrganizationStrategyAlignmentChange
ChangeSystems thinkingCapability
Add more methods