View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Radar |  Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop |  Business Strategy Ansoff Matrix |  Agile Specification by Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do. | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. | The Ansoff Matrix organizes growth options by market and product relation. It helps weigh expansion, diversification, and adaptation cleanly against each other. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 20-40 min pro Story | 45-90 min | 60-90 min pro Feature |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | 3-6 | 2-8 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action Areas | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update | Ansoff Matrix, Growth Options, Risk Notes | Example Table, Acceptance Tests |
Tagsno overlap | AssessmentPortfolioCapability | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development | GrowthStrategyMarketPortfolio | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development |