View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Radar |  Operations 8D Problem Solving |  Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop |  Agile Three Amigos |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do. | For an acute quality or delivery problem, the method structures immediate protection and root cause work together. It keeps the situation stable while the actual cause is investigated cleanly. | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. | When story, test, and implementation could drift apart, it brings business perspective, engineering, and quality together early. It prevents a story from being read differently only late in the process. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 1-6 Wochen | 20-40 min pro Story | 15-30 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | 4-10 | 3-6 | 3 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action Areas | 8D Report, Containment Plan, Root Cause Evidence, Corrective Action Plan | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update | Clarified Story, Test Examples, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | AssessmentPortfolioCapability | QualityProblem solvingRoot cause | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development | CollaborationBehavior-Driven DevelopmentQualityRefinement |