View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Operations RACI Matrix | ![]() Facilitation Responsibility Poker | ![]() Delivery RAID Log | ![]() Facilitation Alignment Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | With unclear responsibilities across several roles or areas, the method creates unambiguous accountability logic. It reduces friction because decision, execution, contribution, and information become separately visible. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 45-90 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-10 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | RACI Matrix, Responsibility Map, Decision Notes | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions |
Tagsno overlap | RolesResponsibilityGovernanceOperations | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation |



